There is also a substantive difference between the proposed legislation here and the FDA's mandate: the FDA's mandate covers substances we put into our bodies i

There is also a substantive difference between the proposed legislation here and the FDA's mandate: the FDA's mandate covers substances we put into our bodies in order to live and/or not die, and even their mandate only goes so far. Even then, an ingredients list doesn't tell you everything. There are cooking processes that can effect the final appeal (read: "healthiness") of the product but which do not need to be disclosed. You're going to need to give me something more than "it impacts society in some way" for the government to begin mandating product decisions, presentation and the disclosure of proprietary information. Human activity and economy doesn't occur in a vacuum, but that doesn't automatically give the government a mandate to regulate every aspect of society including all forms of business activity with a direct government interest and that's a tough sell when we're talking about voluntary services[1]. [1] Notwithstanding systems like Facebook's infamous "shadow profiles" which I am A-OK with the government axing. If you effectively have a "profile" without having a profile you created, that undermines your own agency.