4 ms·
That just isn't true. You're talking about some science communicators and activists, not "scientists".
by lucubratory 3y ago
That just isn't true. You're talking about some science communicators and activists, not "scientists".
- qup 3y agoEven if you somehow know exactly who the gp is talking about, which seems far-fetched, you're nitpicking.
- kibwen 3y agoWell it's also simply false, scientists have historically been careful to provide multiple projections of future outcomes based on optimistic, pessimistic, and in-between estimates.