3 ms·
If the experience involves me becoming more isolated from the people sat in a room beside me then it’s far from a no brainer. Back when we had a baby sleeping
by afavour 3y ago
If the experience involves me becoming more isolated from the people sat in a room beside me then it’s far from a no brainer.
Back when we had a baby sleeping in a room with us my wife and I would each put in separate earphones so we could watch something together without disturbing the baby. It was a very crappy experience to not be able to remark on a single thing to each other. That experience plus being harder to see each other too? No thanks.
- kepano 3y agoIf you and I are on an airplane together, both sitting next to each other but virtually somewhere else, it could be compelling. Currently my two (separated) parents and my two siblings each live in a different city. If all five of us could get together to watch a movie in VR and feel that presence, I think it would be pretty darn fun. By the way — I'm all for real life, "touch grass" type of experiences too. Both can coexist.
- afavour 3y agoSure, I can buy the remote use case. But it’s still not going to replace my home theatre setup I use with people I live with.
- kepano 3y agoI agree, it probably won't replace my home theater setup either. But I wonder if you and I will not be the majority?
- Tagbert 3y agoIt could certainly replace mine if I had one. My husband doesn’t like to watch things on that kind of screen and we have very different tastes in viewing so we are generally watching things separately. Our together time is doing other things without screens. A virtual home theater sounds quite appealing.
- LegitShady 3y agoYou can already do that in VR. But it doesn't replace your home theater, which is the point I made.
- kepano 3y agoI guess we're talking over each other... what I was saying in my original post was: > As simple as it might look, the most compelling mass-market use case I saw from Apple is... watching a movie on an airplane. I don't think this use case is well addressed by the current hardware on the market, mainly due to resolution and optical aberration issues
- thewebcount 3y ago> It was a very crappy experience to not be able to remark on a single thing to each other. That was caused by your baby, not by the devices. 2 people in a small apartment together with their own devices watching what appears to them to be a movie-sized screen would definitely be something many people would like. No big device on the wall. No shaking the people in the apartment next door with your sub-woofer. And you can still comment to each other all you want. (Obviously the price will need to come down for that to be common.)
- afavour 3y ago> That was caused by your baby, not by the devices. It was both. The earphones we were wearing meant we couldn’t hear a word the other was saying, irrespective of whether we’d wake up the baby. The Vision Pro has speakers on the side of it too. I guess I’m not a huge fan of the wall space wasted on my TV but I can’t say it bothers me enough that I want my entire family to strap a headset across our faces every time we want to watch something. Cables coming out the back, a two hour battery life… I’m not doubting the Vision Pro will have uses but I cannot imagine it being a preferable movie-watching experience than a TV.
- Tagbert 3y agoIf the earphones were AirPods you would be able to hear each other talk wiht transparency mode turned on. It doesn’t block external sounds.