2 ms·
Not it's not an argument against your description of the law. But it's an argument that, if what you say is true, then a rational borrower wouldn't surrender t
by rahimnathwani 3y ago
Not it's not an argument against your description of the law.
But it's an argument that, if what you say is true, then a rational borrower wouldn't surrender the building if they thought it to be worth much more than the value of the loan.