35 ms·
wrong way around in a way: it was a VC-funded thing that failed, the tech then turned into a kickstarter, which then gave renewed proof for investors to support
by detaro 3y ago
wrong way around in a way: it was a VC-funded thing that failed, the tech then turned into a kickstarter, which then gave renewed proof for investors to support it too. (Kickstarter was 2019, so unsurprisingly delivery took longer than planned)
- HWR_14 3y agoI was correct in the order. They had a 2014 kickstarter for CastAR[1] that they used as proof of concept to get VC-funding. That company failed. They then (presumably) reacquired the IP and had a second kickstarter for the new company. I'm only talking about the first kickstarter. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CastAR https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CastAR
- detaro 3y agoah, I had forgotten that CastAR had run a kickstarter too.