> Not for Python, I feel. In sheer volume, the vast majority of my Python programs are single-threaded. Yes, they are single threaded, because using multiple t

> Not for Python, I feel. In sheer volume, the vast majority of my Python programs are single-threaded. Yes, they are single threaded, because using multiple threads brings very little benefit in most cases... > If expecting extreme load (like Twitter scale), then Python is usually not the answer (rather go to a statically typed language like Java, Go, Rust etc). So that means we shouldn't get any performance improvements, because there are faster languages out there?