3 ms·
He's not ignorant or lying - you just need to look at Irgun's activities in the '30s and '40s to know that. Those guys were bombing a bus practically every day
by anthonyb 15y ago
He's not ignorant or lying - you just need to look at Irgun's activities in the '30s and '40s to know that. Those guys were bombing a bus practically every day at some points (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Irgun_attacks_during_the_1930s http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Irgun_attacks_during_th...), which makes the hand-wringing from Israel doubly pointless.
Perhaps the problem is that the Palestinians are slacking? They should blow up more things, not less...
- tkahn6 15y agoI'm not going to defend Irgun because it's indefensible. It is simply a matter of fact that the attack was on the headquarters of the British military. Edit: Your subsequent edits are quite sick and disturbing. You should consider reverting your text to the original comment.
- anthonyb 15y agoThe attack was on a hotel - that's also a matter of fact, and similarly indefensible. And I edited about 30 seconds to a minute after my initial post, to make my points clearer. I don't think that's unreasonable, much less "sick or disturbing".