I liked the postscript: Not really sure why this piece was abandoned. I think it was too large and I didn't quite know what I was building up to, partially

I liked the postscript: Not really sure why this piece was abandoned. I think it was too large and I didn't quite know what I was building up to, partially because I was theorising about a problem that I haven't had a huge amount of success with personally. In particular because I liked the article, and I'm glad they published it even though it wasn't finished and had some (acknowledged) missing bits. There are a lot of hollow articles out there which look polished, and there are a lot of un-polished articles (or even un-published) that are actually good, and I for one would like to see more of the latter. It's good, and brave, to publish something that's a little unfinished or scattered or doesn't seem to have a Final Point being made. There can still be good nuggets inside, even though it invites criticism from the peanut gallery (not the fine folks on HN of course, but just in general).