3 ms·
It's not saying they aren't comparable in the sense of you can't compare them at all, but rather that you can't find a single ordering on which you can line peo
by 6gvONxR4sf7o 3y ago
It's not saying they aren't comparable in the sense of you can't compare them at all, but rather that you can't find a single ordering on which you can line people up.
For example, you needed two dimensions to compare yourself to the cardiologist in your example. How do you reduce that to a single dimension? Even within a single title at a single org, it often reduces to the same issue of A is better at X, but B is better at Y (and they differ on twenty other things too).
- john-radio 3y agoI mean, that's why there's such a thing as competencies: https://www.shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/hr-topics/behavioral-competencies/leadership-and-navigation/Pages/leadershipcompetencies.aspx https://www.shrm.org/ResourcesAndTools/hr-topics/behavioral-... People have thought about this topic before! This thread reminds me of https://xkcd.com/1112/ https://xkcd.com/1112/, where the programmer who's never encountered chess before starts explaining to the chess player how it most makes sense to approach it.