3 ms·
> not like I expect gmail to "defederate" an email server I'm pretty sure gmail defeds email servers all the time. IP blocks are the oldest tool in the toolbo
by VWWHFSfQ 3y ago
> not like I expect gmail to "defederate" an email server
I'm pretty sure gmail defeds email servers all the time. IP blocks are the oldest tool in the toolbox
- AnthonyMouse 3y agoThe difference is that email is a one-to-one medium, so it's easy to define spam. It's something the recipient doesn't want. Anyone who sends this or willingly serves users who do is unambiguously a malicious actor, so they get blocked. With forums there are arbitrarily many recipients of any message. A lot of people may not like furries or communists or what have you, but demanding that every other instance ban them as a prerequisite to interoperability is how you kill the network by suppressing everything but the lowest common denominator. This problem is created by tying accounts to instances. Because then other instances, instead of banning the accounts they don't want from only their own instance, can try to get them banned from everywhere by threatening any instance that allows them with disconnection. Which is poison.
- captaincrisp 3y ago> This problem is created by tying accounts to instances. That's a huge issue. My identity should not be tied to anyone but me. This has to be one of the biggest things that scares (admittedly more knowledgeable than average) people off early when they're required to pick a server. Mastodon's "don't worry you can move servers later" is better but still not frictionless, and does not work unless your source server is still online.