3 ms·
> But apparently personnel from the crash retrieval teams have come forward and testified to congress. Crazy, I know. Who? Do you have an article for this? B
by SketchySeaBeast 3y ago
> But apparently personnel from the crash retrieval teams have come forward and testified to congress. Crazy, I know.
Who? Do you have an article for this? Because all I see are claims that people say the retrieval accounting could be possibly credible, but absolutely no first hand accounts.
> That said having discerningly followed this topic for years, I believe what we're seeing is a momentous shift in the status quo and that the revelations from these proceedings will be paradigm shifting.
It's also possible that leadership is becoming less discerning and more than happy to follow whatever makes the biggest headlines.
- stevenhuang 3y agoIt's in the linked article https://thedebrief.org/intelligence-officials-say-u-s-has-retrieved-non-human-craft/ https://thedebrief.org/intelligence-officials-say-u-s-has-re... > Several current members of the recovery program spoke to the Inspector General’s office and corroborated the information Grusch had provided for the classified complaint. If we believe the claims, it's looking more the case that leadership is completely in the blind regarding these activities. These UAP programs have operated without congressional oversight, and so are illegal. Leadership is now forced to address these claims seriously, for the first time since the 70s.