4 ms·
Agreed. It would have pushed the 2->3 migration from "very painful for the ecosystem" to a full on perl5->6 break between the two versions. Not sure it would ha
by mardifoufs 3y ago
Agreed. It would have pushed the 2->3 migration from "very painful for the ecosystem" to a full on perl5->6 break between the two versions. Not sure it would have survived that.
- __d 3y agoIt's not like Python adoption and use was significantly boosted by Python3: it was and would have been just fine without it. The problem with languages written by language designers/implementers is that they often don't know when to stop. Wirth is a shining example here: Pascal -> Modula(n) -> Oberon. You need to move on, and leave the old alone.