3 ms·
> The sources complying with regulation and testing requirements, however light, will be more expensive than someone growing some plants in the back of a spare
by marssaxman 3y ago
> The sources complying with regulation and testing requirements, however light, will be more expensive than someone growing some plants in the back of a spare building somewhere.
That is not the case here in Seattle. The shop near my house sells a vast array of marijuana products at prices the old black market could never have touched. Economy of scale works! The testing requirements add real value - very few people will choose to buy some sketchy black-market grower's mystery weed when they can select from dozens of strains with measured cannabinoid percentages at a legal shop instead.
Here's an article explaining why Washington has been more successful than California in moving its marijuana industry aboveground:
https://reason.com/2022/11/14/washington-has-been-much-more-successful-than-california-in-displacing-the-black-market-for-pot/ https://reason.com/2022/11/14/washington-has-been-much-more-...
- OkayPhysicist 3y agoWhile onerous regulation is probably a significant contributor, the continued existence of California's black market is probably helped by the fact that a lot (by some estimates ~60%) of the cannabis in the country was coming from California pre-legalization, the vast majority from a couple counties on the rather remote northern coast. The culture there is the intersection of hippies and libertarians (of both the left and right varieties), a conglomeration basically joined exclusively by their general disdain towards government oversight. A lot of farms went legit, but it's not exactly surprising that others didn't.