3 ms·
Surely you can argue it is a fundamental right to have communication between consenting adults. But often in the case of advertising, the receiving party does n
by bondarchuk 3y ago
Surely you can argue it is a fundamental right to have communication between consenting adults. But often in the case of advertising, the receiving party does not really have a choice. I would sooner argue that it should be a fundamental right to not be on the receiving end of communications you don't want, than that it should be a fundamental right to advertise to people who do not want to be advertised to.
- treis 3y ago>But often in the case of advertising, the receiving party does not really have a choice I can't think of a situation where that's true.
- Marsymars 3y agoThis is my key argument on why billboards and similar advertising that can’t be avoided if you’re in public shouldn’t be allowed. There’s been no consent obtained.