Only because I've written many words and had very specific concepts, 'essence', to represent with words. What I'm saying is not 'popularized', it's a set of ver

Only because I've written many words and had very specific concepts, 'essence', to represent with words. What I'm saying is not 'popularized', it's a set of very specific points. You could GPT-ize what I said into 'feel-good talk' or 'hallmark cards' but you would lose the concept of 'the very broad brush does not deliver the tone you want, but a generalized one that will reach more people through being already based in how they see things'. If you need to get a mass audience to see a new thing, ChatGPT is NOT your friend… it will tell them what they already know… the wild thing is how the original claim is just this, 'ChatGPT got an audience to see a new thing', but the ChatGPT-style payoff of 'they smiled bovinely and accepted the new information' is clearly what the ARTICLE AUTHOR wanted to hear, and thus it's a really suspicious take.