8 ms·
I’m not actually the first person you were talking to, so I didn’t give you any definition. In fact, if you note, I’ve never actually used either word. I just
by true_religion 3y ago
I’m not actually the first person you were talking to, so I didn’t give you any definition.
In fact, if you note, I’ve never actually used either word. I just refer to them obliquely.
- 0ct4via 3y ago"You yourself imply there are different degrees to how acceptable the two terms are." I never claimed either were acceptable or unacceptable. Interesting how you completely gloss over your needless language policing, especially when you - by your own admission -- haven't even used the terms in question (and presumably lack the nuance necessary to weigh in, despite jumping in anyway) shrug
- _a_a_a_ 3y ago> I never claimed either were acceptable or unacceptable and > Love how you're trying to justify degrees of acceptable misogynist terms So you are not saying either are unacceptable, and you endorse 'acceptable' misogyny. So you are a misogynist, but an ok one. Very well.
- 0ct4via 3y agoWhat the ever-loving fuck? I don't endorse ANY misogyny you utter melon, which was why I called you out on your "Really isn't, it's about the same as calling a woman a cow." nonsense. The only one "endorsing" misogyny here is you. Stop projecting, pillock.