4 ms·
Given that your very first point is arguing semantics, I think it shows how weak any argument that you can bring forward is, so I won't even read the rest.
by iLoveOncall 3y ago
Given that your very first point is arguing semantics, I think it shows how weak any argument that you can bring forward is, so I won't even read the rest.
- randomdata 3y ago1. Defining previously nebulous terms to clearly identify how they will be used as follows is not arguing semantics. To frame it as a semantic argument is erroneous. 2. Comments are always written by the author, for the author. If you do not want to read it, great. It wasn't ever for you.