2 ms·

The UK is not getting drier. In fact I believe that statistics and models show and predict that it is getting wetter. What is changing is the seasonality with m

The UK is not getting drier. In fact I believe that statistics and models show and predict that it is getting wetter. What is changing is the seasonality with more rain in automn and winter and less rain in summer, and as the article mentions there is high geographical variability. This means that there are some solutions but they would require large scale infrastructure projects... which are not materialising and which the country is terrible at and so we get floods in winter and water restrictions in summer. "A new potable water reservoir hasn’t opened in the UK since 1992" (2022) [1] During that time population went from 57 to 69 million... So there is also the general lack of investment in infrastructure, nevermind climate change, which is a common pattern in the country. And, food for thought: "There is a seemingly direct link between the 1989 privatisation of water companies in the UK and the ceasing of new reservoirs being built" [1] https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/the-challenge-of-building-more-reservoirs-to-ensure-uks-water-resilience-01-09-2022/ https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/the-challenge-of-bui...

fredley 3y ago
Privatising utilities like this (and electricity etc.) has never made any sense to me. It all happened in the UK well before I was old enough to understand that sort of thing. I have grown up very aware of the failings of privatising public infrastructure. Can someone explain what the problems were with this stuff being owned and run nationally that privatisation was supposed to fix?
- Gibbon1 3y ago
  > what the problems were with this stuff being owned If you're a director of a publicly owned company and you loot it, you go to prison.
- Fronzie 3y ago
  In the Netherlands the same happened with the railway and healthcare coverage. The motivation was that market pressure would lead to increased efficiency. In practice, there's a tendency towards monopoly and a forest of product variants leading to more confusion and people buying sub-optimal. The net effect over here is negative, in my opinion.
  - mytailorisrich 3y ago
    The thing is there is no market pressure for water/sewage, which is a monopoly and even a natural monopoly. There are very good argument to have a working market wherever possible but obviously that does not work with natural monopolies. In those cases it makes more sense to make it a state-owned company and to drive investment while keeping costs down for the benefits of all. Nothing new as this has been a recognised issue since the 19th century.

fredley 3y ago

Privatising utilities like this (and electricity etc.) has never made any sense to me. It all happened in the UK well before I was old enough to understand that sort of thing. I have grown up very aware of the failings of privatising public infrastructure. Can someone explain what the problems were with this stuff being owned and run nationally that privatisation was supposed to fix?

Gibbon1 3y ago
> what the problems were with this stuff being owned If you're a director of a publicly owned company and you loot it, you go to prison.
Fronzie 3y ago
In the Netherlands the same happened with the railway and healthcare coverage. The motivation was that market pressure would lead to increased efficiency. In practice, there's a tendency towards monopoly and a forest of product variants leading to more confusion and people buying sub-optimal. The net effect over here is negative, in my opinion.
- mytailorisrich 3y ago
  The thing is there is no market pressure for water/sewage, which is a monopoly and even a natural monopoly. There are very good argument to have a working market wherever possible but obviously that does not work with natural monopolies. In those cases it makes more sense to make it a state-owned company and to drive investment while keeping costs down for the benefits of all. Nothing new as this has been a recognised issue since the 19th century.