4 ms·
And thus we will have invented a lossy rarefaction scheme for communication? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rarefaction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rarefactio
by tirpen 3y ago
And thus we will have invented a lossy rarefaction scheme for communication?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rarefaction https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rarefaction
- vidarh 3y agoWe already do that during normal communication - people rarely say what they mean in the simplest way possible. We couch the message in all kinds of extraneous details. The tediousness of which is part of why some people want to use LLMs to generate messages for them in the first place. Stripping that out might ironically reduce the need: Of people come to expect their messages to be automatically stripped of fluff, why include it in the first place?
- williamcotton 3y agoIt is possible to learn how to write concisely.
- mattkrause 3y agoYou can learn to write concisely.
- williamcotton 3y agoI see what you’re trying to do there but you should have said “one” instead of “you” to have the same effect!
- mattkrause 3y agoI waffled on whether you/one would be better!
- vidarh 3y agoIt's exactly because most of us can write concisely that there is a perceived benefit to use ChatGPT and similar to expand a concise instruction into a longer message that meets the social expectations. Those social expectations are what often prevents us from sending those concise messages to people today.