3 ms·
It’s definitely an expense. But this doesn’t fully explain why nuclear is expensive. -Current nuclear reactors aren’t nearly hot enough to need single crystal
by metal_am 3y ago
It’s definitely an expense. But this doesn’t fully explain why nuclear is expensive.
-Current nuclear reactors aren’t nearly hot enough to need single crystal turbine blisks. We’re talking on the order of 300°C.
-Coal power plant routinely hit much higher temperatures in supercritical and ultra-supercritical (yes, that’s a real term) steam generators. We don’t have quite as bad a problem building coal power plants.
-We’re not currently building molten salt reactors for power generation.
You didn’t say anything that was wrong. I’m just don’t think this is the reason building reactors is so expensive.
- pfdietz 3y agoYeah, the high tech blades occur in combustion turbines. A simple cycle combustion turbine power plant might have 5% of the capital cost per watt of a nuclear power plant.