3 ms·
> moved to runtime So a completely different scenario? Let's assume for a moment that developers only ever 'build' or 'check' their code, but all actual runti
by insanitybit 3y ago
> moved to runtime
So a completely different scenario? Let's assume for a moment that developers only ever 'build' or 'check' their code, but all actual runtime behavior is in production. In production we have toooooons of security tooling for monitoring and constraining program behavior. On dev computers? Basically nothing.
Of course, developers run `test` as well, and sometimes they run the whole program but these use cases, especially at companies, are increasingly moving to CI.
- salawat 3y agoNot running your tests locally to make sure stuff actually compiles/works before commiting to the repo and blowing up everyone else is a great way to piss off your QA group. Please, make sure it runs locally first. CI often costs $$$, and when you nab a QA for debugging support, nothing irritates more than the answer "Well, no..." to the question "Did you even compile/run this?"
- insanitybit 3y ago> Not running your tests locally to make sure stuff actually compiles/works before commiting to the repo and blowing up everyone else is a great way to piss off your QA group. Uh... branches? Obviously?