3 ms·
Ben fails to mention that the equation he proposed is "violated" is expressly "optional" and in fact the standard allows that "a TCP MAY start with a larger ini
by joedev 15y ago
Ben fails to mention that the equation he proposed is "violated" is expressly "optional" and in fact the standard allows that "a TCP MAY start with a larger initial window".
- joedev 15y agoMaybe I'm not reading rfc3390 right? This: "This increased initial window is optional: a TCP MAY start with a larger initial window." And specifically this: "MAY start with a larger initial window". "larger" than what? a.) larger than that proposed? or b.) larger than was standard before this proposal?