6 ms·
Until a cause is completely identified, there will always be "reason to believe". That doesn't mean that it's the most likely source or the most reasonable hypo
by object-a 3y ago
Until a cause is completely identified, there will always be "reason to believe". That doesn't mean that it's the most likely source or the most reasonable hypothesis.
The President was also claiming the virus came from WIV back in May 2020. It was a common theory in some media circles
- splendor_spoon 3y agoThat same president also claimed it would be gone by the summer of 2020. The same president even claimed it would never make it to the USA! Maybe this will be a case of a broken clock being correct twice a day but it was certainly thrown in with quite a bit of incorrect information that was being spewed at those daily briefings. I don’t blame anyone for being skeptical of the information coming out of the Trump administration during that time.
- object-a 3y agoI don't blame people for doubting either, especially because it was mixed in with assertions on the right that COVID was a bioweapon gone rogue. My point isn't whether it's credible, just that one of the most powerful people in the world expressed support for Lab Leak very early on