3 ms·
Inefficiency was always a red herring. $ curl https://www.reddit.com https://www.reddit.com > /dev/null % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Tim
by zrm 3y ago
Inefficiency was always a red herring.
$ curl https://www.reddit.com https://www.reddit.com > /dev/null
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
100 970k 0 970k 0 0 840k 0 --:--:-- 0:00:01 --:--:-- 840k
That's just the index, not images or anything pulled in by scripts. That page takes longer to download on a gigabit internet connection than the <5kB page it ought to be could be uploaded from some asymmetric 10Mbps up cable connection.
The biggest problem is actually funding. The centralized site puts ads on it or tells VCs they could, and then has money to pay for developers or other things that increase the user base.
It's the same reason Linux is used by programmers and not graphic designers. If there is anything deficient about it in the programmer's workflow they fix it for everybody. If there is anything deficient about it in the graphic designer's workflow, they don't know how to fix it so they get a Mac and run Adobe. Social media sites work more like the latter than the former until someone finds a way around that.
- dietr1ch 3y agoI'm not too concerned about efficiency either. Growing with slow and spotty rural internet taught me the hard way that data locality is key. Also, with enough data, having to get only what you care about is probably faster.