3 ms·
>5.0 m/px How does that compare to , e.g. aerial photography resolution or some familiar standard ? Edit: ChatGPT gave me: .28 cm/px for a studio portrait
by hammock 3y ago
>5.0 m/px
How does that compare to , e.g. aerial photography resolution or some familiar standard ?
Edit: ChatGPT gave me:
.28 cm/px for a studio portrait photo (factor 2000x)
8.3 cm/px for a landscape photo (factor 60x)
30-200 cm/px for aerial photos (factor 2-20x)
- zokier 3y agoCommercial satellites imaging Earth can do about 30cm/px (or .3m/px), conventional aerial photos are afaik in the ballpark of 5cm/px, drones can do <1cm/px The special thing about this Murray mosaic is that it seamless continuous image across the whole Mars surface, they spent lot of time gluing and stitching the raw images together. Furthermore, important for science, each pixel can afaik be traced back to specific capture, so there is provenance.