It's a nice thought, but the only thing you'll get from large scale group editing & group think is mediocrity, endless confusion and endless debate. There has

It's a nice thought, but the only thing you'll get from large scale group editing & group think is mediocrity, endless confusion and endless debate. There has never been an amazing piece of 'legislation' drafted by a huge group of people. There's a very good reason why that's the case. Intelligent discourse in which critical differences and conflicts can be sorted out, can't occur at hyper scale because it becomes an echo chamber - all you'll end up hearing is everybody shouting back and forth, resulting in absolutely nothing. The only way they can do this, if they're serious about it, is through using a representation system, in which a group of people empowers one person to speak, negotiate and resolve on their behalf so that things actually get done.