4 ms·
Lots of Biotech stuff does fine, and plenty of tech startups are basically frauds (WeWork for example). I don’t think you can extrapolate that startup funding d
by eapressoandcats 3y ago
Lots of Biotech stuff does fine, and plenty of tech startups are basically frauds (WeWork for example). I don’t think you can extrapolate that startup funding doesn’t work for Biotech.
- rfgmendoza 3y ago[flagged]
- AlexandrB 3y agoI'm not sure what makes WeWork a tech startup. Renting short term office space is not a high-tech endeavor. But it's true that there are plenty of tech startup frauds, like Nicola.
- kneebonian 3y agoBecause we work isn't a short term office rental it is a company that aims to "revolutionize global consciousness" which is clearly a growth industry.
- fullshark 3y agoTheir argument paraphrased from the failed S-1 https://www.vox.com/recode/2019/8/14/20804029/wework-ipo-tech-company-valuation https://www.vox.com/recode/2019/8/14/20804029/wework-ipo-tec...
- d0gsg0w00f 3y agoFWIW, the WeWorks I've worked in have better tech than most traditional offices I've worked in. The printing and room booking experiences are pretty great.
- bee_rider 3y agoI’m sure there are other great examples, but WeWork doesn’t really seem like one; they were a real estate company, right? Cryptocurrency stuff maybe could be a better example though.
- ravi-delia 3y agoI feel like Crypto generally delivers on what it promises in terms of technology. If I go to investors to found Holebucket to produce the worlds first bucket manufactured with a one inch hole straight through the bottom, it isn't exactly hard to accomplish my goal. Crypto startups have a product, it's just a really dumb product. But Theranos for instance just straight up never had a product in the first place.