7 ms·
>Insanely good text clarity. Higher pixel density (35.5 PPD) than any portable VR headset currently on the market (e.g., 56% higher than the Quest Pro & 220% hi
by quitit 3y ago
>Insanely good text clarity. Higher pixel density (35.5 PPD) than any portable VR headset currently on the market (e.g., 56% higher than the Quest Pro & 220% higher than the Valve Index).
And on the Simula product page:
> • 35.5 PPD pixel density (higher than any other portable VR headset on the market)
Microsoft Hololens 2: 47 PPD (1)
Varjo VR-3: 70 PPD (2)
Food for thought.
(1) https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/hololens/buy https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/hololens/buy
(2) https://varjo.com/products/vr-3/ https://varjo.com/products/vr-3/
- kanetw 3y agoThe Hololens 2's PPD are largely fake. There was a writeup somewhere but it's way, way below the stated number. Varjo is pretty high up there, and they're able to compete in the clarity department. But their headset is non-portable and only supports Nvidia+Windows (at least last time I checked).
- quitit 3y agoWhile I haven't verified it, that's Microsoft's own claim so they will have their reasons for citing that number so I won't make a claim one way or the other, but have provided a link to the dispute below(1). Simula is not a shipping product, which to be fair means I should be comparing it with any announced but not yet shipping product, and probably not with products that were announced 4 years ago. (1) https://kguttag.com/2020/07/08/hololens-2-display-evaluation-part-2-comparison-to-hololens-1/ https://kguttag.com/2020/07/08/hololens-2-display-evaluation...