3 ms·
> I am definitely not going to spend $3.5k and still buy a $1k MacBook to do my work. I would happily spend $3.5k on an insanely portable, wraparound, multi-mo
by culturestate 3y ago
> I am definitely not going to spend $3.5k and still buy a $1k MacBook to do my work.
I would happily spend $3.5k on an insanely portable, wraparound, multi-monitor setup for my $1k MacBook.
If this thing works anywhere close to as well as they say it does for that use case, I won’t be able to get my credit card out fast enough. The fact that it could be used independently is just a cherry on top.
- npace12 3y agoyou can only get 1 screen streamed from the mac at 4k they said
- rbreaves 3y agoPretty sure with RDP type apps and lower res you can easily push 2 or 4 screens... but yea probably not at 4k. Sheesh that isn't even necessary for people doing productive work. Except for maybe video editors.
- taskforcegemini 3y agoresolutiin requirements change dramatically when vr is involved. you don't want to be reading blurry text and pixels don't map 1:1 when "projected" in vr
- jonhohle 3y agoWindow layers are already separate and independently renderable. It would be great to get just all windows as opposed to a Mac desktop panel where windows are stuck inside. (Kind of how Classic apps could run within the OS X window space.) Stage Manager may have laid the groundwork for window groups operating outside the typical desktop or even virtual screen idiom.
- jedberg 3y agoOk, but that's version one. Also, not sure I need more than that. Looking at what I have open on my Mac right now, all but two (the IDE and shell) have equivalent iOS apps. So in theory I could run all of those on the Vision Pro in other windows. Pretty sure one 4k window is more than enough to handle the things I can't do on the Vision natively.