7 ms·
Don't get me started
by joostdecock 3y ago
Don't get me started
- LeifCarrotson 3y ago[flagged]
- franky47 3y agoI don't see the problem, it's a perfectly cromulent word.
- 8675309t 3y ago[flagged]
- chrsig 3y agoI mean, just to push one onto the stack... > When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. "That is idiotic; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3." > Please don't post comments saying that HN is turning into Reddit. It's a semi-noob illusion, as old as the hills. > Don't feed egregious comments by replying; flag them instead. If you flag, please don't also comment that you did.
- 0ct4via 3y agoFYI, barking orders at people and swearing at them because you're personally offended by something said in humor, is much more stupid, and is arguably more unwelcome here than GP's comment.
- 8675309t 3y agoDon't do this here.
- zo1 3y agoShouldn't it be spelled "de Kok" if that's a surname?
- oefnak 3y agoNo, because of Baantjer.
- efdee 3y agoMet seej ow seej kaa.
- efdee 3y agoDe Kok, De Cock, De Kock, De Cok, ... All the same. Surname spelling was highly volatile before the French took over.
- quantified 3y agoBeware reading Philip K Dick.