4 ms·
Aaand this is basically the story of silicon valley over and over again. Build a product that's more convenient, and people will use it. Google is so full of s
by zpeti 3y ago
Aaand this is basically the story of silicon valley over and over again.
Build a product that's more convenient, and people will use it. Google is so full of shit now, and even answer boxes are below 4 ads, it's just way more comfortable and efficient to ask chatgpt.
This morning I wanted to know how many calories there are in a breaded chicken breast. Chatgpt told me in 3 seconds after asking. Google would have been way more time. (sidenote: I also hate google, so I'd much rather use chatgpt anyway)
- trafficante 3y agoAlso Google (and distressingly, DDG as of late) sanitizes the hell out of the SERPs to only present you with “approved viewpoints”. And I’m not talking about fringe Q Anon type stuff: the other day I was looking up the specifics of China’s “Blue Sky Initiative” climate change policies and the only thing Goog/DDG would show me (despite several attempts at rephrasing the query) was Western industry think tanks bellyaching about how the policies effect profits. It took me a good ten minutes of refining my search before I got an English translation of the actual policy bullet points. I can’t imagine this being such a PITA on 2013 era Google.
- byteware 3y agoout of curiosity, how did you verify the information?
- zpeti 3y agoI didn’t, but it sounded right. I know it might be incorrect. However, I’ve seen plenty of bad information in google answer boxes too. And finding it in actual search results is going to be way more time. It’s not a life and death question.