3 ms·
I realised soon after posting that it's even dumber than my example. The analogy should have been a volunteer bouncer having a falling out with the owner, and r
by ghusto 3y ago
I realised soon after posting that it's even dumber than my example. The analogy should have been a volunteer bouncer having a falling out with the owner, and refusing to let people watch the show. I mean sure, he could do that, but it's not exactly a shocker when he hears that his services are no longer required.
- ImPostingOnHN 3y agonah, the corrected analogy you're responding to is better, where, after the singer joined when the club first started, and indeed made the club what it is today (and wasn't ever paid), the owner boots said singer and plays recordings of them without compensation or permission instead after all, reddit exists because of the users the company is abusing now, and in spite of said abusers + their abuse like, sure the abusive club owner could physically do that, but most people there, like they do here, would recognize that the owner is in the wrong