4 ms·
1. Neeva sounds like a hairspray brand. Not a search engine. 2. It's literally just a claim. I have no way of verifying the claim. Them asking me to pay for it
by aaomidi 3y ago
1. Neeva sounds like a hairspray brand. Not a search engine.
2. It's literally just a claim. I have no way of verifying the claim. Them asking me to pay for it makes it more sus.
3. I use searx already. Which I can confirm isn’t “spying” on me because it has nothing to tie me to my IRL identity.
4. It was a Bing reseller. I don’t care for Bing resellers.
- aurareturn 3y agoThe point is that it had no "surveillance capitalism". It failed because no one cares about that enough - proving that people prefer free with data mining/ads over subscriptions for many internet products.
- comte7092 3y ago>It failed because no one cares about that enough You say that like there aren’t numerous other competitors in the space: DuckDuckGo, Kagi, Brave, searx, qwant, startpage, etc, etc. These services provide both paid and ad based models. Neeva failed because of its own issues. I am in their target market and I had never even heard of them until they shut down. Starting any business is extremely challenging, one failing doesn’t imply there was no market.
- aurareturn 3y agoSo there are plenty of alternatives and competitors. Problem solved.
- aaomidi 3y agoExcept it literally had an exact connection to my identity and they had the data to do what they wanted to 4 years down the line when investors demanded more returns. Just…no. This is giving me vibes of the FBI “secure” phones. Fuck that.