5 ms·
You're still reading them so they must be somewhat valuable to you.
by HKH2 3y ago
You're still reading them so they must be somewhat valuable to you.
- fkyoureadthedoc 3y agoDoesn't mean the value is in their accuracy, and there are often good comments on software industry posts. The Jupyter Lab 4.0 post currently on the front page for example has a lot of great tips!
- bazeblackwood 3y agoAs an endless source of unintentional humor, absolutely.
- coldtea 3y agoThis is the most tired response. People also read all kinds of shit, watch cat and celeb videos, or doomscroll and hate themselves for wasting that time. People read stuff just to laugh at the ignorance, or in the off chance they'll find a good nugget. People also watch train wrecks. Being "somewhat valuable for them" doesn't imply anything further about it's overall value, or about its objective benefit for them.
- HKH2 3y ago> This is the most tired response. Undoubtedly, but it forces cynics to concede value.
- podgorniy 3y agoThey are. On HN nouise/signal ratio is one of the best I saw on internet in public forums.