4 ms·
And yet you're commenting on HN on something medical, so that means your comment is absolute garbage, which means that HN comments actually are not absolute gar
by downWidOutaFite 3y ago
And yet you're commenting on HN on something medical, so that means your comment is absolute garbage, which means that HN comments actually are not absolute garbage, which means my comment is absolute treasure. Air tight deduction, you're welcome.
- coldtea 3y agoYou know about higher order (meta) statements, right?
- downWidOutaFite 3y agoAre they exempt from being garbage?
- coldtea 3y agoThey are exempt from what they attribute to their lower-order siblings. When someone makes such a statement in a coversation, that should be the implicit charitable interpretation, so much so, that your kind of statement is uncharitable/disingenuous.
- downWidOutaFite 3y ago"You lower order sibblings are all garbage and I won't engage with you because I'm higher order and refuse to stoop to your level" is the most garbage comment on here.
- uoaei 3y agoYou simply don't understand how logic works, but you're too proud to admit it. At least you've demonstrated it adequately.
- burnished 3y agoI think they are being funny - at least, their comments make me laugh, and it would be difficult to interpret the comment about higher order statements 'stooping' in a serious or literal context. Neat side topic though
- FabHK 3y agoCommon mistake: The opposite of "all HN comments on medicine are absolute garbage" is not "all HN comments on medicine are absolute treasure", but "not all HN comments on medicine are absolute garbage", or equivalently "there's at least one HN comment on medicine that's not absolute garbage". This can be deduced indeed, but that gives us no information about your comment.