3 ms·
Oh, that's disappointing. I was hoping for a drug that will finally help me understand how monads are just simply monoids in the category of endofunctors.
by xeonmc 3y ago
Oh, that's disappointing. I was hoping for a drug that will finally help me understand how monads are just simply monoids in the category of endofunctors.
- naich 3y agoMaybe LSD or mushrooms?
- mmiliauskas 3y agoThis guy monoids.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- PartiallyTyped 3y agoI know that you are memeing, but if are interested in category theory and have exp in functional programming; “category theory” for programmers is possibly a good place to start.
- HKH2 3y agoIt's probably so simple you assume the most straightforward understanding of it couldn't possibly be right.
- swader999 3y agoThere is a drug already for that. Catnip.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- amboo7 3y agoNo, rather in the category of endocrine functors.
- qingcharles 3y agoI'm also disappointed. I hoped it would help me understand palato-alveolar ejective fricatives and how they differ from voiced retroflex lateral approximants. Back to the drawing board!