3 ms·
So people like John and George are “The Beatles” but people like Pete Best are not, because of some arbitrary attachment you have to them personally. I mean I
by ratg13 3y ago
So people like John and George are “The Beatles” but people like Pete Best are not, because of some arbitrary attachment you have to them personally.
I mean I get it, but you shouldn’t try and force your personal paradigm on others.
- coldtea 3y ago>So people like John and George are “The Beatles” but people like Pete Best are not Yes. >because of some arbitrary attachment you have to them personally No, because those (Best and Stuart) aren't the persons that wrote and played the Beatles seminal songs and albums, or that billions of people identified as the Beatles during their recording career. Best is just a member from when they were a small time cover band, that was sacked before they made anything of importance, and who didn't contribute anything to their music or their sound, and zero album songs. You could remove everything they did with Best and you'll still have their discography intact, including all their seminal songs. Try doing that without the other four. That's the very opposite of "arbitrary attachment"... >I mean I get it Nah, you clearly don't.