Interesting finding, and it sounds like the authors tried to disentangle possible confounding factors. However, I thought that the concept of priming (referred

Interesting finding, and it sounds like the authors tried to disentangle possible confounding factors. However, I thought that the concept of priming (referred to in one of the follow-up studies) was no longer thought to be as valid as before. Is this not true, or perhaps it is only reliable under certain conditions?