3 ms·
I sincerely appreciate the corrections, and I don't think it wrecks my argument to have the totals be seven, ten, and five. And owning should be construed as so
by jaybrendansmith 3y ago
I sincerely appreciate the corrections, and I don't think it wrecks my argument to have the totals be seven, ten, and five. And owning should be construed as something more extreme than simply dominating in the latter case.
- andsoitis 3y agoNear 100% of my food come from producers not one of the 7. I live in Los Angeles, so that might be a good explanation. But then, how would you economically produce and distribute food to people in more rural locales, if not for some consolidation? The question of course is what is a reasonable number - is it 7? Or 20? There's no objective answer etched into a tablet somewhere. Instead, dynamic social forces produce an outcome.