4 ms·
you're either being disingenuous or maybe you're legitimately ignorant, I can't tell. It's clearly not 'precisely how it works today'. Sometimes words mean thin
by idiotsecant 3y ago
you're either being disingenuous or maybe you're legitimately ignorant, I can't tell. It's clearly not 'precisely how it works today'. Sometimes words mean things. This is one of those cases.
- throwaway14356 3y agoHere is the premium truth, not a section but the entire article: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks and here is what citizen editors wanted to write: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_conspiracy_theories And here is the guideline that says you cant do a POV fork: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Content_forking https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Content_forking I have no opinion on the topic.
- idiotsecant 3y agoAre you asserting that some shadowy cabal paid wikipedia to keep 9/11 conspiracy theories off the main article? If not, how is that related to our discussion? FWIW, I also don't see any section about whether or not bigfoot karate kicked the towers down either.