3 ms·
> Finally, the motion to quash highlighted the Doe defendant’s fears that exposing their identity could lead to undue embarrassment and all sorts of related pro
by dumpsterdiver 3y ago
> Finally, the motion to quash highlighted the Doe defendant’s fears that exposing their identity could lead to undue embarrassment and all sorts of related problems. Specifically, it “would be highly embarrassing to Defendant, unjustifiably stigmatizing to Defendant, injurious to Defendant’s character and reputation, and potentially jeopardizing to Defendant’s employment.”
I know it's not the same, but imagine how funny it would be if someone got caught robbing a physical store that dealt in pornographic videos, and then suggested that they shouldn't be prosecuted because it would be embarrassing if everyone found out what they did.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- dublinben 3y agoThe defendant would be better off if they had robbed a physical store. They’d almost certainly be not facing any consequences. Even if they were, they’d be significantly less severe than what’s possible in these cases.
- dumpsterdiver 3y agoYeah, weirdly the defendants in this case probably really would have been better off physically robbing a store in order to obtain the porno they wanted. They probably would have just been told to go home, and please don't steal porno movies anymore.