4 ms·
That's assuming that the current crop of SEO'd garbage is better than the same content generated by an llm. I'm not sure that's the case.
by voat 3y ago
That's assuming that the current crop of SEO'd garbage is better than the same content generated by an llm. I'm not sure that's the case.
- jjoonathan 3y agoAgreed, it seems like every year or so I run into a case where I know something exists and has accessible robots.txt but is completely invisible to google.
- indus 3y agoEither way it is the start of search engine’s decline. - Generated content added to LLM. QED. - Generated content added to SERP. DEAD. ;-)
- j16sdiz 3y agoCurrent crop of SEO garbage follows some simplistic templates. I would assume they take less "effort" (memory storage, parameters, time, whatever) to learn. It have space left for other novel stuffs LLM garbage, on the other hand, would take up the whole model..