3 ms·
It's conventional wisdom to save ~10% for retirement, on top of being taxed (along with your employer) ~15.3%. That's ~25.3% of personal income going to retirem
by onlyrealcuzzo 3y ago
It's conventional wisdom to save ~10% for retirement, on top of being taxed (along with your employer) ~15.3%. That's ~25.3% of personal income going to retirement.
This is inline with most advanced economies.
Of that ~6.4% - A LOT of that is healthcare related costs.
Considering that healthcare in the US is ~18.2% of GDP - and the vast majority of it comes from retirees - I don't know what you're expecting to see here.
Essentially, you're shocked that healthcare in the US is ~18.2% of GDP, and ~75% of that comes from retirees...
Social Security spending is ~5% of GDP, and Medicare spending is ~4% of GDP... That's for only ~19% of the population. And it doesn't even cover all of their healthcare costs.
If you keep the same ratio for government employees, that comes down to ~2.84% of GDP for healthcare & 3.56% for what most people think of as pensions...
And you're looking at ~65% of that spending coming from state & local governments, not the Federal government.
- jtbayly 3y agoOnly around 60% of the GDP is labor, though. 40% of the GDP on pensions doesn’t seem reasonable for a variety of reasons. If pensions are considered part of the labor cost, that would mean not 25% of income going to retirement, but 66%! Or, if pensions are separate from labor, you’ve used up all 100% of the GDP, just between labor and pensions. Neither seems reasonable. Furthermore, the US only spends 7.5% of the GDP on pensions all told.[0] If these numbers are equivalent, that means 85% of pension dollars are going to government workers. [0]: https://data.oecd.org/socialexp/pension-spending.htm https://data.oecd.org/socialexp/pension-spending.htm