> Frameworks such as Spring used to be much more like this Not really. Spring has always had problems with pointless complexity and turning what should be comp

> Frameworks such as Spring used to be much more like this Not really. Spring has always had problems with pointless complexity and turning what should be compile time errors into runtime ones. Its original schtick was DI, which you've always been able to do by just... sending dependencies in through the constructor, lol? No framework or magic needed. The emperor really has no clothes and I wish more people would admit that.