3 ms·
The study can not be accessed without payment, but if they did not correctly control for kids, it is useless.
by lostmsu 3y ago
The study can not be accessed without payment, but if they did not correctly control for kids, it is useless.
- scarmig 3y agohttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6731029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6731029/ > Covariates. We control for covariates that are likely associated with both psychological distress and marital strain including respondent age, education, and employment status (Mirowsky & Ross, 2003), spouse health status (Kiecolt-Glaser & Wilson, 2017), relationship duration (Proulx et al., 2007), and children in household (Mirowsky & Schieman, 2008). So at least they attempted to account for obvious covariates.
- UncleMeat 3y agoThis is my favorite kind of scientific criticism. People who can't even access a paper just saying "well I bet they didn't control for obvious thing X" and then moving on.
- lostmsu 3y agoThis is my favorite kind of personal attacks. Never have I said "they did not control", but here you are.
- UncleMeat 3y agoNot a personal attack. A criticism of the content of your post.
- lcnPylGDnU4H9OF 3y ago> Never have I said "they did not control" They didn’t make this claim. > "well I bet they didn't control for obvious thing X" Is a close paraphrase of > if they did not correctly control for kids, it is useless The comment seems to be intended as a dismissal while calling itself out as uninformed (“cannot be accessed without payment” suggests it wasn’t accessed).
- lostmsu 3y agoThey did, but the study does not make the same conclusion as the article you linked. TBH I am not familiar with the the way data is presented in this last link, and likely biased toward my own expectations, but my uneducated read of table 2 says that children, education, being a woman, and employment status are the largest contributors to the distress.