I’ve had a lot of fun with Ruby’s support for functional paradigms but that stuff is unlikely to get through code review when the status quo tends towards ‘Clea

I’ve had a lot of fun with Ruby’s support for functional paradigms but that stuff is unlikely to get through code review when the status quo tends towards ‘Clean Code’ style OOP over-abstraction. Ruby being a type 2 lisp is a fun one - creating a class and and a factory function with the same name, with argument forwarding: class Animal; …; end def Animal(…); Animal.new(…); end