Yeah, I'm using the definition of status from improv, which I think actually captures how people act and feel. The discussion started based on what people feel

Yeah, I'm using the definition of status from improv, which I think actually captures how people act and feel. The discussion started based on what people feel biochemically and that's based on our daily actions and actual status, rather than our formal social rank. I would be surprised to learn anyone is truly immune from status in this sense. "Keith Johnstone understands status as something one does, independent of the social status one has. Social status represents one's rank in a social order. At the upper end are secular and spiritual leaders (kings, priests), at the bottom end, dependents and outcasts. Social rank is approximately demonstrated through offices, titles, awards, and status symbols. Johnstone's "status", on the other hand, comes from the behavior of the characters in a specific encounter. He stresses that there is no neutral status; rather, some sort of difference is always present. A good actor is always conscious of the relative status of the portrayed characters and can playfully vary it." https://improwiki.com/en/wiki/improv/status#:~:text=In%20improvisational%20theater%2C%20%22status%22,character%20in%20a%20lower%20status https://improwiki.com/en/wiki/improv/status#:~:text=In%20imp....