yep. Chomsky used the term "universal grammar", but it's much more likely a universal abstract semantics++ thing (coupled with sound processing stuff, plus repe

yep. Chomsky used the term "universal grammar", but it's much more likely a universal abstract semantics++ thing (coupled with sound processing stuff, plus repetition, plus a bunch of other stuff in the brain that helps learning in general). how much is innate, what exactly does that mean, all good questions. and of course raw intelligence (pattern matching, strategizing, learning, adaptiveness, modeling, ability to form a sort of consistent and goal-orientedly useful predictive model of the world based on inputs, and goal-oriented control of behavior based on these aforementioned models) by definition can learn language. and of course it's a strange question of are LLMs intelligent in this sense despite lacking goals?