4 ms·

This is outstanding, personally I would immediately switch to it if it was an addon for zsh instead of a standalone new shell. While I'm spending quite some ti

by kytazo 3y ago

This is outstanding, personally I would immediately switch to it if it was an addon for zsh instead of a standalone new shell. While I'm spending quite some time in my shell and the extend that its a core part of my system is quite considerable and makes switching to another shell altogether a huge time investment. Nonetheless, I'll always keep an eye on promising alternatives and eventually switch over once the functionality missing gets apparent enough on a constant basis as it happened for me when switching from fish to zsh.

drbaba 3y ago
> once the functionality missing gets apparent enough on a constant basis as it happened for me when switching from fish to zsh. As someone that went the other way ~5 years ago, I’m curious what made you switch :). Are you btw on a hand-rolled config or one of the distributions? (For me, it was that I was maintaining a ~400 line zsh config, and then learned that fish did most of the things I had configured “out of the box”. I considered switching back for increased POSIX compatibility since I often write bash scripts at work, but since Fish 3 added POSIX-compatible syntax for most pain points, I haven’t kept up with zsh.)