4 ms·

No company has an incentive to give a premium experience unless people pay. That’s how businesses work.

smoldesu 3y ago
Apple especially. They've firewalled developers from developing meaningful extensions to iOS, threaten to sue anyone who researches their systems, and will die clutching their App Store revenue rather than defer to the user's choice. Apple could easily be incentivized to improve the App Store and first-party software if they let developers compete with them. They don't, though. It's a deliberate, arbitrary decision made by a group of people who's primary motivation is to not disturb the profit margins. You can make of that what you will, but methinks their way of computing is due in for a reckoning. Someone had to blink.
- throw4747477 3y ago
  If any of this were even remotely true, Android would have blown past them easily. The reason people choose Apple products is because they want Apple’s curation. That’s it, pure and simple. Apple is profitable because customers value this. Those who don’t like Apple have always had plenty of options.
  - frumper 3y ago
    I choose Apple because I have more success with their first party stuff generally working well. The App Store is filled with junk so if they're "pure and simple" reason for being better is that curation, they're doing a terrible job.
    - throw4747477 3y ago
      The web is full of junk, and so is Android. I don’t expect Apple to eliminate apps I don’t like from the store, and I’d say Apple’s first party stuff is part of the curation. You might prefer the store was open, but that clearly isn’t a priority for you. But you refute the GP’s other point in any case - you think their first party stuff is great, which he seems to dispute.
      - frumper 3y ago
        Their App Store could be a wild Wild West and the first party stuff would still be great, work well, and integrate with other Apple products. It has nothing to do with the App Store curation.
        throw4747477 3y ago
        Sure, but that was clearly not a priority for you. For others it certainly is, and in aggregate people choose the platform with its curation. All things being equal, if the closed store were a net negative of any significance, Android would be doing much better than it is.
      - smoldesu 3y ago
        Hey now, I used to develop for Apple products. Life is short though, and catering to Apple's every whim is like living with a fat and lazy king who demands tribute for doing nothing. When MacOS and iOS had the confidence to show me ads, I left. Their comment honestly resonates with me - I also paid extra for Apple products because I thought I'd get a better experience. As time goes on, that experience has not lived up to the standard it should have. Apple's insistence on cagey behavior has turned me off their ecosystem entirely for personal usage.
  - smoldesu 3y ago
    Android did blow past them easily. If you live in any country of the world that isn't the United States, the overwhelming majority of your population likely uses an Android device. It's been like that for close to a decade at this point. I'm not refuting that Apple can't do this - that's for regulators and legislators to decide, not you or me. I'm more highlighting that they've made things very hard on people for much longer than they've been shitting on a benign crypto app. One might even say that they're known for abusing their market position, at this point.

Apple especially. They've firewalled developers from developing meaningful extensions to iOS, threaten to sue anyone who researches their systems, and will die clutching their App Store revenue rather than defer to the user's choice. Apple could easily be incentivized to improve the App Store and first-party software if they let developers compete with them. They don't, though. It's a deliberate, arbitrary decision made by a group of people who's primary motivation is to not disturb the profit margins. You can make of that what you will, but methinks their way of computing is due in for a reckoning. Someone had to blink.

throw4747477 3y ago
If any of this were even remotely true, Android would have blown past them easily. The reason people choose Apple products is because they want Apple’s curation. That’s it, pure and simple. Apple is profitable because customers value this. Those who don’t like Apple have always had plenty of options.
- frumper 3y ago
  I choose Apple because I have more success with their first party stuff generally working well. The App Store is filled with junk so if they're "pure and simple" reason for being better is that curation, they're doing a terrible job.
  - throw4747477 3y ago
    The web is full of junk, and so is Android. I don’t expect Apple to eliminate apps I don’t like from the store, and I’d say Apple’s first party stuff is part of the curation. You might prefer the store was open, but that clearly isn’t a priority for you. But you refute the GP’s other point in any case - you think their first party stuff is great, which he seems to dispute.
    - frumper 3y ago
      Their App Store could be a wild Wild West and the first party stuff would still be great, work well, and integrate with other Apple products. It has nothing to do with the App Store curation.
      - throw4747477 3y ago
        Sure, but that was clearly not a priority for you. For others it certainly is, and in aggregate people choose the platform with its curation. All things being equal, if the closed store were a net negative of any significance, Android would be doing much better than it is.
    - smoldesu 3y ago
      Hey now, I used to develop for Apple products. Life is short though, and catering to Apple's every whim is like living with a fat and lazy king who demands tribute for doing nothing. When MacOS and iOS had the confidence to show me ads, I left. Their comment honestly resonates with me - I also paid extra for Apple products because I thought I'd get a better experience. As time goes on, that experience has not lived up to the standard it should have. Apple's insistence on cagey behavior has turned me off their ecosystem entirely for personal usage.
- smoldesu 3y ago
  Android did blow past them easily. If you live in any country of the world that isn't the United States, the overwhelming majority of your population likely uses an Android device. It's been like that for close to a decade at this point. I'm not refuting that Apple can't do this - that's for regulators and legislators to decide, not you or me. I'm more highlighting that they've made things very hard on people for much longer than they've been shitting on a benign crypto app. One might even say that they're known for abusing their market position, at this point.